PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOVL vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOVL vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOVL

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWS

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.64%
YTD
15.78%
6M
14.47%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOVL vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%6.43%22.87%17.72%-9.39%40.14%-13.20%7.00%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.78%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FOVL and IWS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between FOVL and IWS has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FOVL vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FOVL
IWS

Financial Services

44.6%
13.7%

Industrials

12.8%
16.2%

Energy

7.7%
7.4%

Utilities

7.5%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.7%

Technology

5.0%
18.7%

Healthcare

4.9%
7.6%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.1%

Real Estate

2.6%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

5.3%

Financial Services

FOVL
44.6%
IWS
13.7%

Industrials

FOVL
12.8%
IWS
16.2%

Energy

FOVL
7.7%
IWS
7.4%

Utilities

FOVL
7.5%
IWS
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FOVL
5.2%
IWS
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

FOVL
5.0%
IWS
4.7%

Technology

FOVL
5.0%
IWS
18.7%

Healthcare

FOVL
4.9%
IWS
7.6%

Communication Services

FOVL
4.7%
IWS
3.1%

Real Estate

FOVL
2.6%
IWS
8.3%

Basic Materials

FOVL

-

IWS
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOVL vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOVL vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOVLIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

FOVL vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOVL vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOVLIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

Volatility

FOVL vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOVLIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

FOVL vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOVL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FOVL vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

FOVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%1.36%2.08%2.59%3.38%2.80%2.88%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.34%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOVL and IWS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FOVL.

IWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for FOVL.

FOVL tracks MSCI USA IMI Focused Value Factor Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FOVL and 0.23% for IWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOVL and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer