FOTO vs. GOOX
FOTO (Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF) and GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOTO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle, while GOOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FOTO charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GOOX.
Performance
FOTO vs. GOOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FOTO
- 1D
- 4.81%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GOOX
- 1D
- 8.51%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 24.05%
- 1Y
- 213.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 71.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.45M | $6.59M | $20.09M | |
| $9.21M | $7.02M | $7.62M |
FOTO vs. GOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | -23.30% |
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | -11.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOTO and GOOX is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOTO vs. GOOX — Risk / Return Rank
FOTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GOOX
FOTO vs. GOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOTO | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOTO vs. GOOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOTO drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, smaller than the maximum GOOX drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTO and GOOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOTO | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -52.46% | +11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.07% | -17.55% | -12.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.66% | -17.47% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.11% | — |
Volatility
FOTO vs. GOOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOTO | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 49.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.72% | 64.16% | +16.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.72% | 61.98% | +18.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.72% | 61.98% | +18.74% |
FOTO vs. GOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOTO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOTO vs. GOOX - Dividend Comparison
FOTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 0.25% | 0.30% | 16.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOTO and GOOX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FOTO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOTO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.
GOOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for FOTO.
FOTO is categorized as Technology Equities, while GOOX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FOTO and 1.05% for GOOX.
Find the right allocation for FOTO and GOOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer