FOSL vs. MOV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and Movado Group, Inc. (MOV).

Performance

FOSL vs. MOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and Movado Group, Inc. (MOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FOSL vs. MOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FOSL Fossil Group, Inc.	14.63%	125.15%	14.38%	-66.13%	-58.11%	18.69%	10.03%	-49.90%	102.45%	-69.95%
MOV Movado Group, Inc.	18.43%	13.86%	-30.56%	2.02%	-19.68%	159.46%	-23.55%	-28.95%	0.13%	14.30%

Fundamentals

EPS FOSL : -$0.97 MOV : $1.17
PS Ratio FOSL : 0.17 MOV : 0.82
Total Revenue (TTM) FOSL : $1.00B MOV : $671.31M
Gross Profit (TTM) FOSL : $563.10M MOV : $363.60M
EBITDA (TTM) FOSL : $18.68M MOV : $41.07M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSL achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than MOV's 18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSL has underperformed MOV with an annualized return of -20.45%, while MOV has yielded a comparatively higher 2.34% annualized return.

FOSL

• 1D: 6.68%
• 1M: -7.91%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 6M: 67.70%
• 1Y: 274.78%
• 3Y*: 10.44%
• 5Y*: -19.16%
• 10Y*: -20.45%

MOV

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 30.87%
• 1Y: 58.71%
• 3Y*: 2.31%
• 5Y*: 3.37%
• 10Y*: 2.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FOSL vs. MOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOSL

FOSL Risk / Return Rank: 93
FOSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FOSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FOSL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FOSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FOSL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

MOV

MOV Risk / Return Rank: 81
MOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
MOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
MOV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
MOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MOV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOSL vs. MOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and Movado Group, Inc. (MOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FOSL	MOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	1.45	+1.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	1.99	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.27	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.45	2.28	+3.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.07	6.92	+8.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FOSL vs. MOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the MOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSL and MOV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FOSL	MOV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.64	1.45	+1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	0.09	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.21	0.05	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.17	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between FOSL and MOV is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FOSL vs. MOV - Dividend Comparison

FOSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FOSL Fossil Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOV Movado Group, Inc.	5.73%	6.79%	7.11%	7.96%	4.34%	2.27%	0.00%	3.68%	2.53%	1.61%	1.81%	1.71%

Drawdowns

FOSL vs. MOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSL drawdown since its inception was -99.44%, which is greater than MOV's maximum drawdown of -86.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSL and MOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOSL	MOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.44%	-86.06%	-13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.27%	-23.66%	-28.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.42%	-66.64%	-28.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.18%	-82.73%	-15.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.88%	-34.62%	-62.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.70%	-31.23%	-17.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.91%	7.81%	+11.10%

Volatility

FOSL vs. MOV - Volatility Comparison

Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) has a higher volatility of 24.51% compared to Movado Group, Inc. (MOV) at 12.14%. This indicates that FOSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOSL	MOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.51%	12.14%	+12.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.04%	25.82%	+52.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.89%	40.75%	+64.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.87%	39.40%	+50.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.92%	46.66%	+49.26%

Financials

FOSL vs. MOV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fossil Group, Inc. and Movado Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FOSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fossil Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 160.95M and revenue of 280.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.4%.

MOV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Movado Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 103.63M and revenue of 191.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.1%.

FOSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fossil Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 839.00K and revenue of 280.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

MOV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Movado Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.81M and revenue of 191.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

FOSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fossil Group, Inc. reported a net income of 21.27M and revenue of 280.52M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

MOV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Movado Group, Inc. reported a net income of 12.56M and revenue of 191.58M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.