PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSKX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOSKX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K (FOSKX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSKX achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 10.59% return.


FOSKX

1D
1.68%
1M
4.66%
YTD
8.93%
6M
8.94%
1Y
14.37%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
9.26%

FHLFX

1D
0.78%
1M
1.95%
YTD
10.59%
6M
11.10%
1Y
25.40%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOSKX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FOSKX
Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K
8.93%20.90%5.28%20.70%-24.71%19.43%15.55%28.58%-14.44%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
10.59%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSKX and FHLFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.95

The correlation between FOSKX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSKX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOSKX
FOSKX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FOSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOSKX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K (FOSKX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOSKXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.15

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

8.04

-4.13

FOSKX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSKX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOSKX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSKX drawdown since its inception was -59.28%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSKX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSKXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.28%

-33.58%

-25.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-11.37%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-13.62%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.45%

-29.36%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-6.08%

-8.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.03%

+0.47%

Volatility

FOSKX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K (FOSKX) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.91%. This indicates that FOSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSKXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

4.91%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

12.74%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

15.27%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.92%

16.06%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

17.65%

-0.36%

FOSKX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOSKX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOSKX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

FOSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than FHLFX's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.13%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FOSKX
Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K
4.55%4.96%1.84%1.13%0.88%4.64%0.62%1.44%6.08%0.06%2.09%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FOSKX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOSKX has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to FHLFX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSKX dropped -59.28% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSKX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer