PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FORH vs. PTMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FORH vs. PTMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Formidable ETF (FORH) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FORH vs. PTMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FORH
Formidable ETF
1.07%16.27%-5.63%-0.69%-1.64%-0.11%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
2.52%-1.55%13.22%7.29%-13.99%2.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FORH achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than PTMC's 2.52% return.


FORH

1D
1.97%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
1.07%
6M
-3.20%
1Y
16.61%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
10Y*

PTMC

1D
2.87%
1M
-5.41%
YTD
2.52%
6M
3.98%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
5.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FORH vs. PTMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FORH has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PTMC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FORH vs. PTMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FORH
FORH Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FORH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FORH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FORH Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FORH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FORH Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FORH vs. PTMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formidable ETF (FORH) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FORHPTMCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

0.55

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

0.89

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.86

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.12

3.40

-0.28

FORH vs. PTMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FORH Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the PTMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FORH and PTMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FORHPTMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.55

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.44

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between FORH and PTMC is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FORH vs. PTMC - Dividend Comparison

FORH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, which matches PTMC's 1.80% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FORH
Formidable ETF
1.81%1.82%0.00%3.88%3.72%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.80%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%

Drawdowns

FORH vs. PTMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FORH drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, roughly equal to the maximum PTMC drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FORH and PTMC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FORHPTMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-20.53%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-8.89%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.73%

-7.12%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-6.55%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

2.25%

+3.56%

Volatility

FORH vs. PTMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Formidable ETF (FORH) is 5.02%, while Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that FORH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FORHPTMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

6.55%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

11.98%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.07%

13.84%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

12.94%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

12.92%

+3.21%