PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOPCX vs. YASLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOPCX vs. YASLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class C (FOPCX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOPCX achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than YASLX's 16.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FOPCX has underperformed YASLX with an annualized return of 7.91%, while YASLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.


FOPCX

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.45%
YTD
6.61%
6M
8.30%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
7.91%

YASLX

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.72%
YTD
16.77%
6M
14.87%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOPCX vs. YASLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOPCX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class C
6.61%23.76%3.01%15.76%-29.71%16.46%18.29%27.68%-14.96%34.17%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
16.77%6.27%11.23%3.65%-13.59%24.45%12.82%17.07%-10.15%34.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FOPCX and YASLX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.63

The correlation between FOPCX and YASLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOPCX vs. YASLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOPCX
FOPCX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FOPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FOPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

YASLX
YASLX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
YASLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YASLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
YASLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
YASLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
YASLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOPCX vs. YASLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class C (FOPCX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOPCXYASLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.72

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

4.92

-0.29

FOPCX vs. YASLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOPCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the YASLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOPCX and YASLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOPCXYASLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.60

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.25

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.76

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.62

-0.29

Drawdowns

FOPCX vs. YASLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOPCX drawdown since its inception was -72.97%, which is greater than YASLX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOPCX and YASLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOPCXYASLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.97%

-38.91%

-34.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-10.18%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-16.65%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.41%

-27.74%

-13.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.41%

-38.91%

-2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-0.71%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.37%

-8.22%

-12.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.54%

-0.18%

Volatility

FOPCX vs. YASLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class C (FOPCX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) at 2.74%. This indicates that FOPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YASLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOPCXYASLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

2.74%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

8.56%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.69%

10.99%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

16.32%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

15.02%

+1.09%

FOPCX vs. YASLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOPCX has a 2.28% expense ratio, which is higher than YASLX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOPCX vs. YASLX - Dividend Comparison

FOPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, while YASLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOPCX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class C
11.45%12.21%5.97%3.05%6.93%9.29%0.00%0.00%1.89%1.31%0.00%0.37%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%15.82%8.97%0.94%3.85%2.62%12.95%9.89%4.86%3.28%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOPCX and YASLX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOPCX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to YASLX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOPCX dropped -72.97% vs YASLX's -38.91%.

YASLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOPCX and YASLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer