FOPC vs. DFGP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FOPC (Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF) and DFGP (Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOPC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Frontier, while DFGP is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FOPC returned 4.70% vs 5.12% for DFGP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FOPC charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFGP.

Performance

FOPC vs. DFGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOPC achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than DFGP's 1.11% return.

FOPC

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 0.43%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFGP

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOPC vs. DFGP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	0.46%	6.54%	-0.00%
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	1.11%	5.89%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FOPC and DFGP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	0.90

The correlation between FOPC and DFGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FOPC vs. DFGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOPC

FOPC Risk / Return Rank: 47
FOPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FOPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FOPC Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FOPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FOPC Martin Ratio Rank: 45

DFGP

DFGP Risk / Return Rank: 35
DFGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DFGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DFGP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DFGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DFGP Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOPC vs. DFGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FOPC	DFGP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.30	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.87	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.23	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	1.59	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.33	5.41	+1.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FOPC vs. DFGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the DFGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOPC and DFGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FOPC	DFGP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	1.30	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.57	1.44	+0.13

Drawdowns

FOPC vs. DFGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOPC drawdown since its inception was -2.18%, smaller than the maximum DFGP drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOPC and DFGP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOPC	DFGP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-3.24%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.18%	-3.24%	+1.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.94%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-0.78%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.64%	0.95%	-0.31%

Volatility

FOPC vs. DFGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) is 1.03%, while Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that FOPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOPC	DFGP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.03%	1.65%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.19%	3.25%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86%	3.96%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.10%	4.66%	-1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.10%	4.66%	-1.56%

FOPC vs. DFGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOPC has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGP's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOPC vs. DFGP - Dividend Comparison

FOPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than DFGP's 3.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	3.64%	3.45%	4.51%	0.62%
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	4.27%	4.42%	0.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOPC and DFGP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FOPC and DFGP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FOPC or DFGP?

DFGP has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to FOPC (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOPC dropped -2.18% vs DFGP's -3.24%.

Which ETF is better, FOPC or DFGP?

On 1-year performance, DFGP leads with 5.12% vs 4.70% for FOPC. On fees, DFGP is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, FOPC has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FOPC or DFGP?

Over the 1-year period, DFGP has performed better with a 5.12% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FOPC or DFGP?

DFGP is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FOPC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FOPC or DFGP?

FOPC has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 3.64% for DFGP.

What is the main difference between FOPC and DFGP?

FOPC is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while DFGP is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FOPC and 0.22% for DFGP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.