PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOPAX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOPAX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOPAX achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 9.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FOPAX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 9.12%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.79% annualized return.


FOPAX

1D
1.25%
1M
-0.35%
6M
6.62%
YTD
6.57%
1Y
10.80%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
9.12%

FCNTX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.50%
YTD
9.82%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
26.32%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
17.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOPAX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOPAX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A
6.57%24.63%3.83%16.64%-29.16%17.32%19.26%28.71%-14.35%34.63%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
9.82%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FOPAX and FCNTX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2005

0.69

The correlation between FOPAX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOPAX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOPAX
FOPAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FOPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FOPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOPAX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOPAXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.86

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

7.64

-4.46

FOPAX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOPAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOPAX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOPAX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOPAX drawdown since its inception was -72.76%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOPAX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOPAXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.76%

-49.19%

-23.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-11.30%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.66%

-19.75%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.92%

-32.59%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.92%

-32.59%

-8.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-1.52%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-8.15%

-10.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.74%

+0.66%

Volatility

FOPAX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A (FOPAX) is 4.60%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that FOPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOPAXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

6.83%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

12.05%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

15.12%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

19.35%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

19.71%

-3.83%

FOPAX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOPAX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOPAX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FOPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.26%, more than FCNTX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.25%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FOPAX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class A
11.26%12.00%6.24%3.48%6.51%8.83%0.00%0.81%2.66%1.27%1.10%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOPAX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to FOPAX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOPAX dropped -72.76% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOPAX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer