PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOINX vs. BIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOINX vs. BIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Income Fund (FOINX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOINX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than BIMIX's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FOINX has underperformed BIMIX with an annualized return of 1.67%, while BIMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.15% annualized return.


FOINX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.23%
1Y
5.05%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.67%

BIMIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.15%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
2.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOINX vs. BIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOINX
Tributary Income Fund
0.25%7.37%1.59%5.98%-13.33%-1.51%7.07%8.42%0.02%4.09%
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
-0.06%6.69%3.45%5.78%-8.64%-1.41%7.42%7.05%0.58%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FOINX and BIMIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2001

0.87

The correlation between FOINX and BIMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOINX vs. BIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOINX
FOINX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FOINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FOINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMIX
BIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOINX vs. BIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Income Fund (FOINX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOINXBIMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.55

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

2.31

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.95

-0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.97

5.74

-0.77

FOINX vs. BIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the BIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOINX and BIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOINXBIMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.55

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.31

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.66

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.17

-0.45

Drawdowns

FOINX vs. BIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOINX drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, which is greater than BIMIX's maximum drawdown of -12.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOINX and BIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOINXBIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-12.76%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-2.07%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.02%

-2.44%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

-12.76%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.20%

-12.76%

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.32%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-1.48%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.70%

+0.35%

Volatility

FOINX vs. BIMIX - Volatility Comparison

Tributary Income Fund (FOINX) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) at 0.76%. This indicates that FOINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOINXBIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

0.76%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

1.72%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

2.49%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.85%

3.88%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

3.25%

+1.60%

FOINX vs. BIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOINX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOINX vs. BIMIX - Dividend Comparison

FOINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than BIMIX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
3.72%3.67%3.89%3.21%2.17%2.27%3.49%2.52%2.50%2.35%2.21%2.57%
FOINX
Tributary Income Fund
3.32%3.49%2.91%2.98%2.69%2.30%2.43%2.98%2.98%3.03%2.77%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FOINX and BIMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOINX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to BIMIX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOINX dropped -18.20% vs BIMIX's -12.76%.

BIMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOINX and BIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer