FOHTX vs. QQQX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FOHTX (Nuveen Ohio Municipal Bond Fund) and QQQX (Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund) are both mutual funds - FOHTX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Nuveen, while QQQX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nuveen. Over the past 10 years, FOHTX returned 1.85%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for QQQX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. FOHTX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QQQX.

Performance

FOHTX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (FOHTX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOHTX achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FOHTX has underperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 1.85%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.

FOHTX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 2.25%
• 1Y: 6.70%
• 3Y*: 3.06%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: 1.85%

QQQX

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: 7.43%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 25.88%
• 3Y*: 14.83%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: 13.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOHTX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FOHTX Nuveen Ohio Municipal Bond Fund	1.56%	3.58%	0.34%	5.63%	-7.46%	1.77%	5.17%	7.31%	1.06%	4.85%
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	7.43%	14.87%	25.61%	21.68%	-27.39%	25.32%	15.75%	28.83%	-11.68%	39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FOHTX and QQQX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007	-0.05

The correlation between FOHTX and QQQX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FOHTX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOHTX

FOHTX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FOHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FOHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FOHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FOHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FOHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

QQQX

QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 50
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOHTX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (FOHTX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOHTX	QQQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	1.72	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	2.45	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.32	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.85	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	12.24	-4.21

FOHTX vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOHTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOHTX and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FOHTX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOHTX drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOHTX and QQQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOHTX	QQQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.86%	-57.25%	+39.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.85%	-9.11%	+6.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.46%	-22.80%	+16.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.04%	-29.33%	+17.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.04%	-35.96%	+23.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-5.62%	+5.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-8.01%	+6.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	2.12%	-1.27%

Volatility

FOHTX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (FOHTX) is 0.79%, while Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that FOHTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOHTX	QQQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	6.07%	-5.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.20%	12.46%	-10.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87%	15.14%	-12.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.91%	19.94%	-16.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.02%	21.11%	-17.09%

FOHTX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOHTX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOHTX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

FOHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than QQQX's 8.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FOHTX Nuveen Ohio Municipal Bond Fund	3.71%	3.76%	3.04%	3.09%	2.38%	2.00%	2.74%	3.02%	2.98%	3.23%	3.33%	3.55%
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	8.45%	7.85%	6.73%	7.26%	9.66%	5.85%	6.00%	6.49%	8.40%	5.95%	7.54%	7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOHTX and QQQX in my portfolio?

FOHTX and QQQX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FOHTX or QQQX?

QQQX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to FOHTX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOHTX dropped -17.86% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.