PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOGLX vs. URFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOGLX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6 (FOGLX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOGLX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 13.05% return.


FOGLX

1D
1.04%
1M
-0.94%
6M
3.32%
YTD
5.31%
1Y
11.50%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.29%

URFFX

1D
1.41%
1M
0.64%
6M
9.62%
YTD
13.05%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.12%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FOGLX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6
5.31%14.85%11.48%12.62%-15.90%8.90%13.38%18.91%-4.85%6.48%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
13.05%19.35%11.86%18.12%-15.66%17.70%10.52%20.16%-9.01%8.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FOGLX and URFFX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FOGLX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOGLX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOGLX
FOGLX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FOGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FOGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

URFFX
URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOGLX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6 (FOGLX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOGLXURFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.87

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

12.30

-4.09

FOGLX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOGLX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOGLX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOGLX drawdown since its inception was -22.47%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOGLX and URFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOGLXURFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.47%

-44.25%

+21.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-7.89%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.20%

-14.14%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-23.76%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-0.17%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-5.88%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

1.84%

-0.48%

Volatility

FOGLX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6 (FOGLX) is 2.35%, while USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that FOGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOGLXURFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.93%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.71%

9.82%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.75%

11.86%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.15%

13.97%

-4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.37%

14.33%

-4.96%

FOGLX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOGLX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOGLX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

FOGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than URFFX's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class Z6
8.29%8.23%8.93%2.68%9.30%11.10%7.27%7.11%9.89%4.63%0.00%0.00%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
5.72%6.46%2.61%3.39%11.40%8.13%6.25%11.76%10.21%5.55%3.91%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FOGLX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URFFX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to FOGLX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOGLX dropped -22.47% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOGLX and URFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer