FOF vs. CSRIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX).
FOF is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Nov 24, 2006. CSRIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Feb 14, 2000.
Performance
FOF vs. CSRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FOF vs. CSRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | -0.96% | 13.01% | 23.65% | 17.90% | -22.69% | 28.24% | 1.52% | 31.37% | -9.43% | 23.41% |
CSRIX Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares | 1.88% | 3.10% | 6.26% | 12.75% | -25.15% | 42.40% | -2.55% | 36.11% | -4.68% | 6.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOF achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than CSRIX's 1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FOF has outperformed CSRIX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while CSRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.32% annualized return.
FOF
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 15.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
CSRIX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- 1Y
- 1.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FOF vs. CSRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CSRIX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FOF vs. CSRIX — Risk / Return Rank
FOF
CSRIX
FOF vs. CSRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOF | CSRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.16 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 0.33 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.04 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 0.23 | +0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 0.80 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOF | CSRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.16 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.31 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FOF and CSRIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FOF vs. CSRIX - Dividend Comparison
FOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than CSRIX's 2.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | 8.14% | 7.91% | 8.22% | 9.32% | 9.99% | 7.06% | 8.41% | 7.78% | 9.41% | 7.84% | 8.90% | 9.49% |
CSRIX Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares | 2.40% | 3.14% | 2.97% | 3.04% | 4.28% | 3.87% | 4.91% | 12.97% | 5.45% | 6.28% | 12.61% | 13.63% |
Drawdowns
FOF vs. CSRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOF drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than CSRIX's maximum drawdown of -41.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOF and CSRIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOF | CSRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.38% | -41.45% | -17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -11.41% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.96% | -31.79% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.74% | -41.45% | -8.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.52% | -7.47% | -6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -8.91% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 3.22% | +0.51% |
Volatility
FOF vs. CSRIX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX) at 4.28%. This indicates that FOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOF | CSRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 4.28% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 9.73% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 16.03% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 18.56% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 20.48% | -0.23% |