PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOCSX vs. WMKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOCSX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCSX achieves a 23.55% return, which is significantly higher than WMKSX's 20.14% return.


FOCSX

1D
-1.61%
1M
5.67%
YTD
23.55%
6M
19.65%
1Y
40.47%
3Y*
22.66%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*

WMKSX

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.65%
YTD
20.14%
6M
17.56%
1Y
33.60%
3Y*
25.52%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
14.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOCSX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOCSX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund
23.55%11.33%21.04%19.62%-25.01%10.50%37.44%36.25%-4.60%16.21%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
20.14%16.19%22.12%19.42%-20.72%22.81%36.78%20.32%-13.92%11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FOCSX and WMKSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.91

The correlation between FOCSX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOCSX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOCSX
FOCSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FOCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

WMKSX
WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOCSX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOCSXWMKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

4.14

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

13.86

-0.58

FOCSX vs. WMKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the WMKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOCSX and WMKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOCSX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCSX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, smaller than the maximum WMKSX drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCSX and WMKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOCSXWMKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-64.09%

+25.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-8.50%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.51%

-24.20%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.79%

-39.84%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.62%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-15.65%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

2.53%

+0.71%

Volatility

FOCSX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.61%. This indicates that FOCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOCSXWMKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.07%

4.61%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.47%

12.32%

+5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

17.91%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.69%

26.13%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

23.96%

-0.33%

FOCSX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOCSX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison

FOCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than WMKSX's 19.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOCSX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund
2.22%2.74%2.26%0.23%0.05%31.03%2.78%0.00%2.47%0.09%0.00%0.00%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
19.07%22.91%4.69%5.93%6.23%25.75%8.21%0.00%12.53%8.59%5.26%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FOCSX and WMKSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCSX has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to WMKSX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCSX dropped -38.79% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.

WMKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOCSX and WMKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer