FOCPX vs. FSRPX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FOCPX (Fidelity OTC Portfolio) and FSRPX (Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FOCPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FSRPX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FOCPX returned 21.22%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for FSRPX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FOCPX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for FSRPX.

Performance

FOCPX vs. FSRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCPX achieves a 19.65% return, which is significantly higher than FSRPX's 7.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FOCPX has outperformed FSRPX with an annualized return of 21.22%, while FSRPX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.40% annualized return.

FOCPX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -4.03%
• 6M: 16.48%
• YTD: 19.65%
• 1Y: 37.82%
• 3Y*: 29.20%
• 5Y*: 15.83%
• 10Y*: 21.22%
• ALL TIME*: 14.82%

FSRPX

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: 3.85%
• 6M: 2.13%
• YTD: 7.55%
• 1Y: -0.24%
• 3Y*: 11.37%
• 5Y*: 3.12%
• 10Y*: 12.40%
• ALL TIME*: 13.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FOCPX Fidelity OTC Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FOCPX vs. FSRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FOCPX Fidelity OTC Portfolio	19.65%	22.21%	38.95%	42.64%	-32.08%	24.94%	46.75%	39.20%	-3.30%	38.61%
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio	7.55%	-4.15%	23.28%	26.94%	-29.44%	18.25%	44.27%	26.33%	4.58%	25.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FOCPX and FSRPX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1985	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between FOCPX and FSRPX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FOCPX vs. FSRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOCPX

FOCPX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FOCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FOCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FOCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FOCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FOCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FSRPX

FSRPX Risk / Return Rank: 3
FSRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FSRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FSRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FSRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FSRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOCPX vs. FSRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOCPX	FSRPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	-0.12	+1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	-0.03	+2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.00	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	-0.14	+3.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.63	-0.29	+10.92

FOCPX vs. FSRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the FSRPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOCPX and FSRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FOCPX vs. FSRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCPX drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, which is greater than FSRPX's maximum drawdown of -55.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCPX and FSRPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOCPX	FSRPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.25%	-55.75%	-14.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-17.79%	+6.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.82%	-22.58%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.05%	-39.01%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.05%	-39.01%	+1.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.69%	-6.58%	-1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.96%	-9.09%	-7.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	8.54%	-5.23%

Volatility

FOCPX vs. FSRPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) at 5.46%. This indicates that FOCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOCPX	FSRPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.29%	5.46%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.28%	12.62%	+4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.92%	20.18%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.14%	22.84%	+0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.59%	21.67%	+0.92%

FOCPX vs. FSRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCPX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRPX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOCPX vs. FSRPX - Dividend Comparison

FOCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than FSRPX's 6.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FOCPX Fidelity OTC Portfolio	6.50%	7.78%	16.76%	0.05%	4.06%	11.53%	6.23%	7.58%	7.93%	4.86%	3.24%	5.41%
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio	6.38%	8.75%	12.41%	7.40%	2.90%	15.92%	6.82%	2.13%	2.17%	3.37%	0.14%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOCPX and FSRPX in my portfolio?

FOCPX and FSRPX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FOCPX or FSRPX?

FOCPX has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to FSRPX (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCPX dropped -70.25% vs FSRPX's -55.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.