FOCKX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FOCKX (Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FOCKX returned 23.09%/yr vs 22.06%/yr for FBGRX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FOCKX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FOCKX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCKX achieves a 23.33% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 13.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FOCKX having a 23.09% annualized return and FBGRX not far behind at 22.06%.

FOCKX

• 1D: -2.96%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 23.33%
• 6M: 22.35%
• 1Y: 50.26%
• 3Y*: 32.90%
• 5Y*: 17.33%
• 10Y*: 23.09%

FBGRX

• 1D: -2.58%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 13.83%
• 6M: 12.39%
• 1Y: 34.82%
• 3Y*: 29.71%
• 5Y*: 14.56%
• 10Y*: 22.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOCKX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K	23.33%	22.28%	38.91%	42.92%	-32.07%	25.06%	46.83%	39.36%	-3.18%	38.78%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	13.83%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FOCKX and FBGRX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008	0.96

The correlation between FOCKX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FOCKX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOCKX

FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 54
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOCKX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOCKX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	1.96	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	2.58	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.34	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.68	2.95	+1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.67	12.10	+7.56

FOCKX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOCKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOCKX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FOCKX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCKX drawdown since its inception was -53.33%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCKX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOCKX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.33%	-58.64%	+5.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.28%	-12.65%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.83%	-27.07%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.97%	-43.08%	+6.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.97%	-43.08%	+6.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.91%	-4.71%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-12.51%	+4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	3.07%	-0.40%

Volatility

FOCKX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a higher volatility of 9.53% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 8.47%. This indicates that FOCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOCKX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.53%	8.47%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.17%	14.91%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.81%	19.01%	+0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.01%	25.11%	-2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.57%	23.78%	-1.21%

FOCKX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCKX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOCKX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FOCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than FBGRX's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.67%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K	6.13%	7.56%	16.42%	0.09%	3.97%	11.34%	6.18%	7.49%	7.81%	4.85%	3.25%	5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOCKX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FOCKX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FOCKX or FBGRX?

FOCKX has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to FBGRX (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCKX dropped -53.33% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.