PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNYPX vs. NUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNYPX vs. NUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M (FNYPX) and Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNYPX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than NUV's 3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FNYPX has underperformed NUV with an annualized return of 1.37%, while NUV has yielded a comparatively higher 2.33% annualized return.


FNYPX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.31%
6M
-0.74%
YTD
0.05%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
1.37%
ALL TIME*
2.37%

NUV

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.52%
6M
2.26%
YTD
3.54%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
-1.04%
10Y*
2.33%
ALL TIME*
3.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$4.58M$4.45M$4.78M

FNYPX vs. NUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNYPX
Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M
0.05%4.66%0.82%6.98%-11.23%2.07%3.85%7.51%0.01%5.02%
NUV
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc.
3.54%10.27%4.04%3.99%-14.03%-3.51%7.50%19.75%-4.83%10.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FNYPX and NUV is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1993

0.21

The correlation between FNYPX and NUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNYPX vs. NUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNYPX
FNYPX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FNYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NUV
NUV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNYPX vs. NUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M (FNYPX) and Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNYPXNUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.81

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

13.26

-7.54

FNYPX vs. NUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNYPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the NUV Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNYPX and NUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNYPX vs. NUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNYPX drawdown since its inception was -17.16%, smaller than the maximum NUV drawdown of -35.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNYPX and NUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNYPXNUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.16%

-35.42%

+18.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-4.20%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-7.98%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.22%

-28.29%

+12.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.27%

-28.29%

+12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-6.28%

+3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-8.98%

+5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.89%

+0.15%

Volatility

FNYPX vs. NUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M (FNYPX) is 1.03%, while Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that FNYPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNYPXNUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

1.41%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

5.12%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13%

6.71%

-3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.35%

9.49%

-5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

10.29%

-6.03%

FNYPX vs. NUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNYPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than NUV's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNYPX vs. NUV - Dividend Comparison

FNYPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than NUV's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNYPX
Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M
2.50%3.43%2.11%2.17%1.62%2.27%2.49%2.59%2.53%3.36%3.93%3.54%
NUV
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc.
4.26%4.30%4.16%3.94%3.91%3.41%3.35%3.48%4.01%3.99%4.10%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNYPX and NUV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUV has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to FNYPX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNYPX dropped -17.16% vs NUV's -35.42%.

FNYPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNYPX and NUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer