FNY vs. BKMC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FNY (First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - FNY tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index while BKMC tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNY returned 7.63%/yr vs 8.16%/yr for BKMC. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FNY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKMC.

Performance

FNY vs. BKMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNY achieves a 16.46% return, which is significantly higher than BKMC's 15.12% return.

FNY

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 11.17%
• YTD: 16.46%
• 1Y: 26.38%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: 13.28%
• ALL TIME*: 11.62%

BKMC

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: 1.72%
• 6M: 8.56%
• YTD: 15.12%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 15.17%
• 5Y*: 8.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	$1.18M	$1.05M	$1.02M
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	$2.17M	$2.47M	$2.59M

FNY vs. BKMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	16.46%	14.03%	18.09%	21.13%	-23.80%	13.46%	70.55%
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	15.12%	8.74%	13.78%	17.50%	-16.03%	23.83%	46.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FNY and BKMC is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020	0.91

The correlation between FNY and BKMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNY vs. BKMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNY	BKMC
Industrials	24.1%	23.2%
Healthcare	20.2%	12.3%
Technology	18.9%	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	10.3%
Financial Services	9.3%	12.8%
Real Estate	5.9%	8.3%
Communication Services	3.3%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	3.8%
Energy	1.8%	3.1%
Basic Materials	1.5%	4.5%
Utilities	0.5%	2.3%

Return for Risk

FNY vs. BKMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNY

FNY Risk / Return Rank: 47
FNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FNY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FNY Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BKMC

BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 52
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNY vs. BKMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNY	BKMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.39	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	2.06	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.25	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	2.18	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.95	8.22	-1.26

FNY vs. BKMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the BKMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNY and BKMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNY vs. BKMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNY drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, which is greater than BKMC's maximum drawdown of -25.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNY and BKMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNY	BKMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.91%	-25.02%	-13.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.01%	-9.82%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.97%	-23.68%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.94%	-25.02%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.20%	0.00%	-4.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-6.41%	-1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	2.59%	+1.21%

Volatility

FNY vs. BKMC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) at 4.04%. This indicates that FNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNY	BKMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.56%	4.04%	+2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.57%	11.30%	+5.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.32%	15.42%	+5.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.49%	18.83%	+3.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.48%	19.05%	+3.43%

FNY vs. BKMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BKMC's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNY vs. BKMC - Dividend Comparison

FNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	1.38%	1.35%	1.54%	1.38%	1.63%	1.15%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	0.00%	0.03%	0.56%	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.25%	0.28%	0.06%	0.21%	0.60%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNY and BKMC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FNY and BKMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNY or BKMC?

FNY has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to BKMC (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNY dropped -38.91% vs BKMC's -25.02%.

Which ETF is better, FNY or BKMC?

On 5-year performance, BKMC leads with 8.16% vs 7.63% for FNY. On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNY or BKMC?

Over the 5-year period, BKMC has performed better with a 8.16% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNY or BKMC?

BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNY or BKMC?

BKMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for FNY.

What is the main difference between FNY and BKMC?

FNY tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index, while BKMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNY and 0.04% for BKMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.