FNX vs. PEXL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FNX (First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - FNX tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index while PEXL tracks the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNX returned 8.91%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for PEXL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

FNX vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNX achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 21.13% return.

FNX

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 3.25%
• YTD: 15.76%
• 6M: 13.36%
• 1Y: 29.74%
• 3Y*: 17.67%
• 5Y*: 8.91%
• 10Y*: 13.03%

PEXL

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 21.13%
• 6M: 19.71%
• 1Y: 45.40%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 12.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNX vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund	15.76%	9.87%	12.21%	20.39%	-13.57%	25.05%	16.04%	26.97%	-17.39%
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF	21.13%	27.33%	5.79%	24.40%	-20.41%	30.12%	25.02%	39.86%	-17.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FNX and PEXL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2018	0.85

The correlation between FNX and PEXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNX vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNX	PEXL
Financial Services	18.7%	-
Industrials	18.2%	6.1%
Consumer Cyclical	15.4%	3.8%
Technology	13.3%	58.8%
Healthcare	10.1%	6.8%
Real Estate	7.1%	-
Energy	5.7%	0.9%
Basic Materials	3.2%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	5.9%
Utilities	2.8%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	13.9%

Return for Risk

FNX vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNX

FNX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

PEXL

PEXL Risk / Return Rank: 83
PEXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PEXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PEXL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
PEXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PEXL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNX vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNX	PEXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.37	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.13	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.40	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	3.99	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.12	16.43	-5.31

FNX vs. PEXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the PEXL Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNX and PEXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNX vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and PEXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNX	PEXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.11%	-36.76%	-20.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.24%	-11.43%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.97%	-24.72%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.97%	-30.44%	+5.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.16%	+2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.38%	-6.69%	-1.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	2.77%	-0.09%

Volatility

FNX vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) is 4.45%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that FNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNX	PEXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	8.50%	-4.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	14.94%	-3.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.38%	19.24%	-2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.51%	22.12%	-1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.95%	24.12%	-2.17%

FNX vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNX and PEXL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

FNX vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison

FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than PEXL's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund	0.99%	0.88%	1.26%	1.11%	1.19%	0.94%	1.04%	1.21%	1.01%	0.90%	1.07%	1.07%
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF	0.30%	0.44%	0.48%	0.48%	0.60%	0.22%	0.48%	0.49%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNX and PEXL in my portfolio?

FNX and PEXL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNX or PEXL?

PEXL has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to FNX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs PEXL's -36.76%.

Which ETF is better, FNX or PEXL?

On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 12.68% vs 8.91% for FNX. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FNX has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNX or PEXL?

Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 8.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNX or PEXL?

FNX and PEXL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNX or PEXL?

FNX has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.30% for PEXL.

What is the main difference between FNX and PEXL?

FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.