PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNX vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNX vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNX achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FNX has underperformed AIRR with an annualized return of 11.90%, while AIRR has yielded a comparatively higher 21.89% annualized return.


FNX

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.71%
YTD
11.81%
6M
11.61%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
11.90%

AIRR

1D
0.54%
1M
3.36%
YTD
31.77%
6M
31.32%
1Y
65.82%
3Y*
37.10%
5Y*
25.40%
10Y*
21.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNX vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
11.81%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%17.66%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
31.77%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FNX and AIRR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014

0.87

The correlation between FNX and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNX vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNX
AIRR

Industrials

19.3%
84.6%

Financial Services

18.6%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%

-

Healthcare

10.4%

-

Technology

9.5%
0.5%

Real Estate

8.6%

-

Energy

6.2%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Industrials

FNX
19.3%
AIRR
84.6%

Financial Services

FNX
18.6%
AIRR
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FNX
14.4%
AIRR

-

Healthcare

FNX
10.4%
AIRR

-

Technology

FNX
9.5%
AIRR
0.5%

Real Estate

FNX
8.6%
AIRR

-

Energy

FNX
6.2%
AIRR
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

FNX
4.0%
AIRR

-

Basic Materials

FNX
3.1%
AIRR

-

Utilities

FNX
2.7%
AIRR

-

Communication Services

FNX
2.2%
AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNX vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNX vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNXAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

5.05

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

18.68

-8.73

FNX vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNX and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNXAIRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.61

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

1.01

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.84

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.67

-0.25

Drawdowns

FNX vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than AIRR's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNXAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-42.37%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-13.09%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.97%

-27.95%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-27.95%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.95%

-42.37%

-1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-1.86%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-7.43%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.53%

-0.85%

Volatility

FNX vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) is 4.63%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that FNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNXAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

7.87%

-3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

19.82%

-8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

25.40%

-9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

25.29%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

26.29%

-4.32%

FNX vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNX vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.83%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNX and AIRR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to FNX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 10-year performance, AIRR leads with 21.89% vs 11.90% for FNX. On fees, FNX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FNX has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 21.89% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AIRR.

FNX has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

FNX is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FNX and 0.70% for AIRR.

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNX and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer