PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fonix Mobile plc (FNX.L) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FNX.L is traded in GBp, while ENEL.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENEL.MI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNX.L achieves a -7.95% return, which is significantly lower than ENEL.MI's 8.51% return.


FNX.L

1D
-4.40%
1M
-11.11%
YTD
-7.95%
6M
-19.00%
1Y
-28.89%
3Y*
-4.60%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*

ENEL.MI

1D
-1.00%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
8.51%
6M
8.70%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FNX.L
Fonix Mobile plc
-7.95%-17.94%-9.66%19.25%35.58%23.00%42.86%
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
8.51%44.47%4.45%40.37%-19.51%-17.39%10.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FNX.L and ENEL.MI is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNX.L
FNX.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FNX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ENEL.MI
ENEL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fonix Mobile plc (FNX.L) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNX.LENEL.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.27

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

2.28

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

6.93

-8.43

FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNX.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNX.L and ENEL.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNX.LENEL.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

1.43

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.49

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.32

+0.01

Drawdowns

FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNX.L drawdown since its inception was -42.59%, smaller than the maximum ENEL.MI drawdown of -57.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX.L and ENEL.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNX.LENEL.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.59%

-57.92%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.15%

-12.28%

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.59%

-13.95%

-28.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.59%

-45.77%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.61%

-8.27%

-31.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-16.73%

+2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.27%

4.03%

+15.24%

Volatility

FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI - Volatility Comparison

Fonix Mobile plc (FNX.L) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) at 5.95%. This indicates that FNX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENEL.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNX.LENEL.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.99%

5.95%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.82%

17.38%

+12.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.40%

19.49%

+16.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.35%

21.15%

+16.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.15%

23.08%

+15.07%

Dividends

FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI - Dividend Comparison

FNX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than ENEL.MI's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
5.12%5.29%6.24%5.94%7.55%5.08%3.96%3.96%2.36%2.14%1.91%2.31%
FNX.L
Fonix Mobile plc
5.92%7.00%3.81%2.90%2.99%3.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FNX.L vs. ENEL.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fonix Mobile plc and Enel SpA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. FNX.L values in GBp, ENEL.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


FNX.L and ENEL.MI have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNX.L and ENEL.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer