FNWFX vs. FQEMX
FNWFX (American Funds New World Fund Class F-3) and FQEMX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, FNWFX returned 19.67%/yr vs 48.77%/yr for FQEMX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNWFX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQEMX.
Performance
FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNWFX achieves a 16.80% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 90.31% return.
FNWFX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 7.07%
- YTD
- 16.80%
- 6M
- 18.71%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.03%
- 10Y*
- —
FQEMX
- 1D
- 5.50%
- 1M
- 34.47%
- YTD
- 90.31%
- 6M
- 101.00%
- 1Y
- 169.89%
- 3Y*
- 48.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNWFX American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 | 16.80% | 28.67% | 6.88% | 16.24% | -21.77% | -2.56% |
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM | 90.31% | 55.98% | 6.67% | 12.18% | -20.68% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNWFX and FQEMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FNWFX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNWFX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank
FNWFX
FQEMX
FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNWFX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 6.49 | -3.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | 6.22 | -2.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 2.05 | -0.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 9.31 | -6.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | 36.87 | -25.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNWFX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 6.49 | -3.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.21 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNWFX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, roughly equal to the maximum FQEMX drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNWFX and FQEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNWFX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.40% | -34.46% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.00% | -18.93% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -18.93% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -10.79% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 4.78% | -1.62% |
Volatility
FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) is 5.50%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 13.30%. This indicates that FNWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNWFX | FQEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 13.30% | -7.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 24.45% | -11.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 27.80% | -13.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 21.10% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 21.10% | -4.70% |
FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNWFX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison
FNWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than FQEMX's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNWFX American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 | 5.21% | 6.09% | 4.10% | 2.88% | 1.33% | 7.32% | 0.43% | 4.04% | 2.70% | 2.27% |
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM | 1.67% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 4.82% | 3.93% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNWFX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FQEMX has higher volatility (13.30%) compared to FNWFX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNWFX dropped -33.40% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.
FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.49 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNWFX and FQEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer