FNWFX vs. FQEMX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX).

FNWFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Jun 17, 1999. FQEMX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Nov 21, 2021.

Performance

FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FNWFX American Funds New World Fund Class F-3	-1.47%	28.67%	6.88%	16.24%	-21.77%	-2.56%
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM	12.06%	55.98%	6.67%	12.18%	-20.68%	0.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNWFX achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 12.06% return.

FNWFX

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -8.56%
• YTD: -1.47%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 24.01%
• 3Y*: 13.87%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: —

FQEMX

• 1D: 3.12%
• 1M: -15.56%
• YTD: 12.06%
• 6M: 27.82%
• 1Y: 70.93%
• 3Y*: 25.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNWFX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.

FNWFX

American Funds New World Fund Class F-3

FQEMX

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM

Return for Risk

FNWFX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNWFX

FNWFX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FNWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FNWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FNWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FNWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FNWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FQEMX

FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNWFX	FQEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	3.07	-1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	3.44	-1.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.55	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	3.47	-1.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.63	13.65	-6.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNWFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNWFX and FQEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNWFX	FQEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	3.07	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.62	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FNWFX and FQEMX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

FNWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than FQEMX's 2.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNWFX American Funds New World Fund Class F-3	6.18%	6.09%	4.10%	2.88%	1.33%	7.32%	0.43%	4.04%	2.70%	2.27%
FQEMX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM	2.84%	3.18%	3.15%	4.82%	3.93%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNWFX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, roughly equal to the maximum FQEMX drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNWFX and FQEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNWFX	FQEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.40%	-34.46%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.00%	-18.93%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.73%	-16.40%	+5.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-11.08%	+2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	4.81%	-1.68%

Volatility

FNWFX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) is 7.09%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 14.20%. This indicates that FNWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNWFX	FQEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.09%	14.20%	-7.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	20.17%	-9.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.62%	24.14%	-8.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	19.73%	-4.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.32%	19.73%	-3.41%