PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNSFX vs. ARFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNSFX vs. ARFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX) and American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNSFX achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly higher than ARFVX's 7.01% return.


FNSFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.02%
YTD
14.64%
6M
14.10%
1Y
31.21%
3Y*
20.88%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*

ARFVX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.90%
YTD
7.01%
6M
6.50%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNSFX vs. ARFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K
14.64%23.84%14.14%20.59%-18.20%16.68%18.40%25.44%-8.82%7.37%
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
7.01%14.75%11.30%15.16%-17.44%13.36%17.43%24.02%-5.24%4.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FNSFX and ARFVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FNSFX and ARFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNSFX vs. ARFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNSFX
FNSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FNSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ARFVX
ARFVX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ARFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ARFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNSFX vs. ARFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX) and American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNSFXARFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.33

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

9.95

+4.57

FNSFX vs. ARFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNSFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ARFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNSFX and ARFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNSFX vs. ARFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNSFX drawdown since its inception was -30.92%, smaller than the maximum ARFVX drawdown of -47.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNSFX and ARFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNSFXARFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.92%

-47.41%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-7.82%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.41%

-12.64%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-25.12%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.57%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-6.52%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.83%

+0.40%

Volatility

FNSFX vs. ARFVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) at 3.53%. This indicates that FNSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNSFXARFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

3.53%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

7.96%

+3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

9.71%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

12.56%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

13.63%

+2.39%

FNSFX vs. ARFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNSFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARFVX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNSFX vs. ARFVX - Dividend Comparison

FNSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than ARFVX's 13.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
13.47%14.41%4.91%1.96%6.71%7.57%6.52%8.66%10.95%1.22%3.88%6.89%
FNSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K
4.86%3.70%2.32%2.13%10.66%10.24%3.89%5.99%5.94%2.45%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FNSFX and ARFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNSFX has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to ARFVX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNSFX dropped -30.92% vs ARFVX's -47.41%.

FNSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNSFX and ARFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer