FNPIX vs. UHPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNPIX (ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund) and UHPIX (ProFunds UltraShort China) are both mutual funds - FNPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while UHPIX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, FNPIX returned 13.42%/yr vs -31.72%/yr for UHPIX. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. FNPIX charges 1.72%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for UHPIX.

Performance

FNPIX vs. UHPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNPIX achieves a -10.35% return, which is significantly lower than UHPIX's 18.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FNPIX has outperformed UHPIX with an annualized return of 13.42%, while UHPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -31.72% annualized return.

FNPIX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: -10.35%
• 6M: -7.10%
• 1Y: -1.81%
• 3Y*: 20.57%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

UHPIX

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 18.01%
• 6M: 23.79%
• 1Y: -11.88%
• 3Y*: -31.74%
• 5Y*: -26.86%
• 10Y*: -31.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNPIX vs. UHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund	-10.35%	16.39%	38.51%	18.34%	-23.84%	57.11%	-9.83%	46.49%	-17.23%	27.19%
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China	18.01%	-49.82%	-29.87%	-26.13%	-63.62%	94.89%	-64.76%	-43.34%	39.47%	-57.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FNPIX and UHPIX is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2008	-0.50

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FNPIX and UHPIX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.50 to -0.22, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Return for Risk

FNPIX vs. UHPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNPIX

FNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

UHPIX

UHPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
UHPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
UHPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
UHPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
UHPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
UHPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNPIX vs. UHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNPIX	UHPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	-0.26	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	-0.01	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.00	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	-0.29	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.18	-0.51	+0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNPIX vs. UHPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNPIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the UHPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNPIX and UHPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNPIX	UHPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07	-0.26	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	-0.33	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	-0.14	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	-0.18	+0.27

Drawdowns

FNPIX vs. UHPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNPIX drawdown since its inception was -93.14%, smaller than the maximum UHPIX drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNPIX and UHPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNPIX	UHPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.14%	-99.98%	+6.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.37%	-46.98%	+24.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.21%	-80.96%	+57.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.80%	-96.64%	+58.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.23%	-98.81%	+40.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.16%	-99.96%	+85.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.22%	-93.42%	+57.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.95%	26.52%	-17.57%

Volatility

FNPIX vs. UHPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) is 4.59%, while ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a volatility of 19.09%. This indicates that FNPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNPIX	UHPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	19.09%	-14.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.23%	37.51%	-21.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.37%	52.53%	-31.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.36%	82.92%	-55.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.65%	228.53%	-197.88%

FNPIX vs. UHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNPIX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is lower than UHPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNPIX vs. UHPIX - Dividend Comparison

FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	0.25%	0.00%	13.10%	0.00%	1.70%
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China	3.64%	4.29%	0.00%	3.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNPIX and UHPIX in my portfolio?

FNPIX and UHPIX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNPIX or UHPIX?

UHPIX has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to FNPIX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNPIX dropped -93.14% vs UHPIX's -99.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.