PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNPIX vs. RYVNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNPIX vs. RYVNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) and Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RYVNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNPIX achieves a -4.35% return, which is significantly higher than RYVNX's -32.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FNPIX has outperformed RYVNX with an annualized return of 15.10%, while RYVNX has yielded a comparatively lower -39.72% annualized return.


FNPIX

1D
0.76%
1M
5.10%
YTD
-4.35%
6M
-6.18%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
15.10%

RYVNX

1D
0.41%
1M
-7.14%
YTD
-32.41%
6M
-30.48%
1Y
-48.46%
3Y*
-38.66%
5Y*
-31.78%
10Y*
-39.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNPIX vs. RYVNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
-4.35%16.39%38.51%18.34%-23.84%57.11%-9.83%46.49%-17.23%27.19%
RYVNX
Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
-32.41%-35.24%-34.30%-57.09%65.14%-45.41%-69.71%-50.05%-9.71%-44.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FNPIX and RYVNX is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

-0.66

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FNPIX and RYVNX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.66 to -0.37, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNPIX vs. RYVNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNPIX
FNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RYVNX
RYVNX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RYVNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVNX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVNX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNPIX vs. RYVNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) and Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RYVNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNPIXRYVNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.75

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

-1.01

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.77

-1.95

+2.72

FNPIX vs. RYVNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the RYVNX Sharpe Ratio of -1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNPIX and RYVNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNPIX vs. RYVNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNPIX drawdown since its inception was -93.14%, smaller than the maximum RYVNX drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNPIX and RYVNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNPIXRYVNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.14%

-100.00%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.37%

-47.45%

+25.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.21%

-79.81%

+56.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.80%

-88.89%

+51.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.23%

-99.40%

+41.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.41%

-100.00%

+91.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.16%

-89.57%

+53.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.28%

26.85%

-17.57%

Volatility

FNPIX vs. RYVNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) is 6.29%, while Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RYVNX) has a volatility of 16.58%. This indicates that FNPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYVNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNPIXRYVNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

16.58%

-10.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.81%

28.43%

-11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.83%

35.47%

-13.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.39%

45.63%

-18.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.68%

45.34%

-14.66%

FNPIX vs. RYVNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNPIX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is lower than RYVNX's 2.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNPIX vs. RYVNX - Dividend Comparison

FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYVNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.71%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
0.00%0.00%0.49%0.25%0.00%13.10%0.00%1.70%
RYVNX
Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
15.71%10.62%6.03%4.56%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNPIX and RYVNX have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYVNX has higher volatility (16.58%) compared to FNPIX (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNPIX dropped -93.14% vs RYVNX's -100.00%.

FNPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNPIX and RYVNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer