FNPIX vs. BMPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX).
FNPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000. BMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 3, 2001.
Performance
FNPIX vs. BMPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNPIX vs. BMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund | -17.62% | 16.39% | 38.51% | 18.34% | -23.84% | 57.11% | -9.83% | 46.49% | -17.23% | 27.19% |
BMPIX ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund | 11.87% | 9.09% | -5.35% | 15.30% | -16.22% | 38.93% | 18.27% | 25.13% | -26.81% | 34.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNPIX achieves a -17.62% return, which is significantly lower than BMPIX's 11.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FNPIX has outperformed BMPIX with an annualized return of 13.01%, while BMPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.49% annualized return.
FNPIX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- -17.62%
- 6M
- -16.27%
- 1Y
- -7.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
BMPIX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -11.85%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNPIX vs. BMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNPIX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BMPIX's 1.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNPIX vs. BMPIX — Risk / Return Rank
FNPIX
BMPIX
FNPIX vs. BMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNPIX | BMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | 0.66 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | 1.13 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.14 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.81 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 2.63 | -3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNPIX | BMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 0.66 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.21 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.33 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.16 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNPIX and BMPIX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNPIX vs. BMPIX - Dividend Comparison
FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 13.10% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BMPIX ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund | 1.62% | 1.81% | 0.94% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
FNPIX vs. BMPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNPIX drawdown since its inception was -93.14%, which is greater than BMPIX's maximum drawdown of -84.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNPIX and BMPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNPIX | BMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.14% | -84.22% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -21.39% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.80% | -38.50% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.23% | -61.41% | +3.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.12% | -12.48% | -8.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -24.24% | -12.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.50% | 6.60% | +0.90% |
Volatility
FNPIX vs. BMPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) is 6.14%, while ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that FNPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNPIX | BMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 8.81% | -2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.85% | 18.58% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.86% | 31.56% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.38% | 29.57% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.68% | 32.06% | -1.38% |