FNOV vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNOV is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. FNOV is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, FNOV returned 16.65% vs 116.49% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. FNOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

FNOV vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNOV achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 8.06% return.

FNOV

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 6.20%
• YTD: 7.31%
• 1Y: 16.65%
• 3Y*: 13.51%
• 5Y*: 9.21%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 15.85%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 116.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNOV vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November	7.31%	16.34%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	8.06%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FNOV and WNTR is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.45

Return for Risk

FNOV vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNOV

FNOV Risk / Return Rank: 84
FNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 88

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 65
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNOV vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNOV	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.06	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	2.34	+0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.32	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.60	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.98	6.69	+8.30

FNOV vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNOV and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNOV vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNOV drawdown since its inception was -24.41%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNOV and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNOV	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.41%	-42.65%	+18.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.71%	-42.65%	+36.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.84%	+11.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-20.57%	+17.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	16.58%	-15.48%

Volatility

FNOV vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) is 2.38%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that FNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNOV	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	18.80%	-16.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.09%	47.57%	-41.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.56%	53.81%	-46.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.53%	53.62%	-42.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.61%	53.62%	-40.01%

FNOV vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNOV vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

FNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 104.11%.

Position	TTM	2025
FNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	104.11%	58.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNOV and WNTR in my portfolio?

FNOV and WNTR have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNOV or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to FNOV (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNOV dropped -24.41% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, FNOV or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 116.49% vs 16.65% for FNOV. On fees, FNOV is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FNOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNOV or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 116.49% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNOV or WNTR?

FNOV is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNOV or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 0.00% for FNOV.

What is the main difference between FNOV and WNTR?

FNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FNOV and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.