PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNITX vs. FOCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNITX vs. FOCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNITX achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than FOCPX's 27.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FNITX has underperformed FOCPX with an annualized return of 16.12%, while FOCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.63% annualized return.


FNITX

1D
0.02%
1M
3.48%
YTD
9.30%
6M
12.43%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
27.24%
5Y*
15.24%
10Y*
16.12%

FOCPX

1D
0.78%
1M
10.68%
YTD
27.59%
6M
28.74%
1Y
61.90%
3Y*
34.85%
5Y*
19.55%
10Y*
22.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNITX vs. FOCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
9.30%22.36%34.61%35.61%-26.67%24.10%23.30%28.81%-4.89%27.76%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
27.59%22.21%38.95%42.64%-32.08%24.94%46.75%39.20%-3.30%38.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FNITX and FOCPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.91

The correlation between FNITX and FOCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNITX vs. FOCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNITX
FNITX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FNITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNITX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FNITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNITX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCPX
FOCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FOCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNITX vs. FOCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNITXFOCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.59

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

5.57

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

24.59

-12.67

FNITX vs. FOCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the FOCPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNITX and FOCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNITXFOCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

3.55

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.87

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

1.01

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.66

-0.03

Drawdowns

FNITX vs. FOCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNITX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, smaller than the maximum FOCPX drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNITX and FOCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNITXFOCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-70.25%

+20.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-11.29%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-24.82%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.06%

-37.05%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.06%

-37.05%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-17.01%

+9.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

2.55%

-0.20%

Volatility

FNITX vs. FOCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) is 3.54%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that FNITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNITXFOCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

5.41%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

13.89%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

17.71%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

22.66%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

22.44%

-3.15%

FNITX vs. FOCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNITX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCPX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNITX vs. FOCPX - Dividend Comparison

FNITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than FOCPX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
9.36%11.08%6.33%6.43%18.00%13.42%8.54%6.62%14.33%7.86%4.99%4.45%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
6.09%7.78%16.76%0.05%4.06%11.53%6.23%7.58%7.93%4.86%3.24%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FNITX and FOCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCPX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to FNITX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNITX dropped -49.84% vs FOCPX's -70.25%.

FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNITX and FOCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer