FNIDX vs. MSFT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).

FNIDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2017.

Performance

FNIDX vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNIDX vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNIDX Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd	0.33%	29.80%	5.67%	14.65%	-18.89%	7.65%	12.98%	22.20%	-14.00%	12.96%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-23.45%	15.58%	12.93%	58.19%	-28.02%	52.48%	42.53%	57.56%	20.80%	25.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNIDX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -23.45% return.

FNIDX

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -6.48%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 3.10%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 13.59%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: —

MSFT

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -7.32%
• YTD: -23.45%
• 6M: -28.63%
• 1Y: -2.61%
• 3Y*: 9.46%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: 22.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FNIDX vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNIDX

FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 35
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNIDX vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNIDX	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	-0.10	+1.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	0.04	+1.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.01	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	-0.03	+2.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.87	-0.07	+7.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNIDX vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNIDX and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNIDX	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	-0.10	+1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.37	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.73	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between FNIDX and MSFT is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FNIDX vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

FNIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than MSFT's 0.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNIDX Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd	2.80%	2.81%	2.34%	2.64%	2.32%	1.93%	1.13%	2.17%	2.28%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.94%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%

Drawdowns

FNIDX vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNIDX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNIDX and MSFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNIDX	MSFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.17%	-69.38%	+36.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.36%	-33.91%	+22.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.79%	-37.15%	+4.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.49%	-31.58%	+23.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.37%	-21.77%	+13.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	12.61%	-9.63%

Volatility

FNIDX vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) has a higher volatility of 8.09% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 6.23%. This indicates that FNIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNIDX	MSFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.09%	6.23%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.69%	19.13%	-7.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.84%	26.44%	-9.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.65%	26.16%	-10.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	26.88%	-10.34%