PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGLX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGLX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6 (FNGLX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGLX achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 13.34% return.


FNGLX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.76%
YTD
12.12%
6M
14.33%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
20.02%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*

FQLSX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.24%
YTD
13.34%
6M
15.44%
1Y
30.69%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGLX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6
12.12%23.45%13.95%19.61%-17.95%16.30%17.81%26.88%-7.97%8.02%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
13.34%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%25.96%-8.31%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGLX and FQLSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FNGLX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGLX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGLX
FNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGLX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6 (FNGLX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGLXFQLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

2.53

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.20

3.48

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.47

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.34

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.21

14.83

-1.62

FNGLX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGLX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGLXFQLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.53

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.74

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.77

-0.05

Drawdowns

FNGLX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGLX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGLXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.22%

-31.26%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-9.48%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-15.37%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-27.41%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-5.43%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.14%

+0.09%

Volatility

FNGLX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6 (FNGLX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) at 4.11%. This indicates that FNGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGLXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

4.11%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

10.30%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

12.55%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

15.11%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

16.09%

-0.03%

FNGLX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGLX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGLX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

FNGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than FQLSX's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2060 Fund Class Z6
6.10%4.94%2.04%2.36%10.48%8.88%4.70%6.51%8.88%1.06%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.62%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FNGLX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNGLX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FQLSX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGLX dropped -31.22% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGLX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer