PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGG vs. DLLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGG vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 762.51% return.


FNGG

1D
-4.89%
1M
-7.16%
YTD
5.64%
6M
2.41%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
48.04%
5Y*
10Y*

DLLL

1D
4.21%
1M
89.37%
YTD
762.51%
6M
738.64%
1Y
765.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGG vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FNGG and DLLL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.47

FNGG vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNGG
DLLL

Technology

64.5%
66.6%

Communication Services

25.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FNGG
64.5%
DLLL
66.6%

Communication Services

FNGG
25.2%
DLLL

-

Consumer Cyclical

FNGG
10.3%
DLLL

-

Basic Materials

FNGG

-

DLLL

-

Consumer Defensive

FNGG

-

DLLL

-

Energy

FNGG

-

DLLL

-

Financial Services

FNGG

-

DLLL

-

Healthcare

FNGG

-

DLLL

-

Industrials

FNGG

-

DLLL

-

Real Estate

FNGG

-

DLLL

-

Utilities

FNGG

-

DLLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGG vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGG
FNGG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FNGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

DLLL
DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGG vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNGGDLLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.56

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

13.52

-12.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

27.52

-26.03

FNGG vs. DLLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the DLLL Sharpe Ratio of 5.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGG and DLLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNGG vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, which is greater than DLLL's maximum drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and DLLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGGDLLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.33%

-68.58%

-22.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.01%

-57.19%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.87%

-18.41%

-3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.56%

-25.86%

-29.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.65%

28.05%

-11.40%

Volatility

FNGG vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) is 21.11%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 66.89%. This indicates that FNGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGGDLLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.11%

66.89%

-45.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.05%

102.56%

-67.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.67%

131.00%

-87.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.80%

129.67%

-61.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.80%

129.67%

-61.87%

FNGG vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGG vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison

FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DLLL
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
11.22%11.89%0.79%0.88%0.00%4.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGG and DLLL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLLL has higher volatility (66.89%) compared to FNGG (21.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGG dropped -91.33% vs DLLL's -68.58%.

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 765.95% vs 24.87% for FNGG. On fees, FNGG is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, FNGG has been the lower-risk option at 21.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 765.95% return vs 24.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNGG is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.

FNGG tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged), while DLLL tracks Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FNGG and 1.50% for DLLL.

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.91 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGG and DLLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer