PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGG vs. COIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGG vs. COIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -67.10% return.


FNGG

1D
-1.75%
1M
5.15%
6M
14.11%
YTD
14.01%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
47.72%
5Y*
10Y*

COIG

1D
-2.31%
1M
-7.03%
6M
-71.05%
YTD
-67.10%
1Y
-91.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGG vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FNGG and COIG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.55

The correlation between FNGG and COIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGG vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGG
FNGG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FNGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGG Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGG vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNGGCOIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.82

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

-0.97

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.44

-1.26

+2.71

FNGG vs. COIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the COIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGG and COIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNGG vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, roughly equal to the maximum COIG drawdown of -93.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and COIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGGCOIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.33%

-93.79%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.01%

-93.79%

+50.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.68%

-92.61%

+76.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.17%

-54.71%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.12%

72.19%

-55.07%

Volatility

FNGG vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) is 15.56%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a volatility of 33.76%. This indicates that FNGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGGCOIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.56%

33.76%

-18.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.05%

103.76%

-68.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.33%

133.84%

-90.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.49%

144.51%

-77.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.49%

144.51%

-77.02%

FNGG vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGG vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison

FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.44%, while COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
COIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNGG
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
10.44%11.89%0.79%0.88%0.00%4.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGG and COIG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIG has higher volatility (33.76%) compared to FNGG (15.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGG dropped -91.33% vs COIG's -93.79%.

On 1-year performance, FNGG leads with 24.63% vs -91.34% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FNGG has been the lower-risk option at 15.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FNGG has performed better with a 24.63% return vs -91.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FNGG.

FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 10.44%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FNGG and 0.75% for COIG.

FNGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGG and COIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer