FNGG vs. AMDG
FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGG is passively managed, while AMDG is actively managed. Over the past year, FNGG returned 24.87% vs 826.23% for AMDG. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNGG charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.
Performance
FNGG vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 329.09% return.
FNGG
- 1D
- -4.89%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 48.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDG
- 1D
- -11.43%
- 1M
- 15.85%
- YTD
- 329.09%
- 6M
- 325.72%
- 1Y
- 826.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGG vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 5.64% | 14.43% |
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 329.09% | 95.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGG and AMDG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.53 |
The correlation between FNGG and AMDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGG vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank
FNGG
AMDG
FNGG vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGG | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.53 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 14.77 | -14.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 28.66 | -27.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGG vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and AMDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGG | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.33% | -63.32% | -28.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.01% | -56.48% | +13.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.87% | -12.62% | -9.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.56% | -25.39% | -30.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.65% | 29.06% | -12.41% |
Volatility
FNGG vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) is 21.11%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 48.45%. This indicates that FNGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGG | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.11% | 48.45% | -27.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.05% | 102.73% | -67.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.67% | 134.55% | -90.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.80% | 132.44% | -64.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.80% | 132.44% | -64.64% |
FNGG vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGG vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison
FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than AMDG's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 2.61% | 11.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 11.22% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGG and AMDG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDG has higher volatility (48.45%) compared to FNGG (21.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGG dropped -91.33% vs AMDG's -63.32%.
On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 826.23% vs 24.87% for FNGG. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FNGG has been the lower-risk option at 21.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 826.23% return vs 24.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FNGG.
FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 2.61% for AMDG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FNGG and 0.75% for AMDG.
AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.20 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGG and AMDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer