FNDE vs. VEXC
FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FNDE tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net) while VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VEXC.
Performance
FNDE vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than VEXC's 20.67% return.
FNDE
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
VEXC
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 20.67%
- 6M
- 21.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDE vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 11.56% | 2.92% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 20.67% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDE and VEXC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDE vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank
FNDE
VEXC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNDE vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDE | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDE vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and VEXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDE | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.55% | -12.42% | -31.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -3.33% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -2.23% | -9.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility
FNDE vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDE | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 20.27% | -4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 20.27% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 20.27% | -1.07% |
FNDE vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDE vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison
FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than VEXC's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.75% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.43% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDE and VEXC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 1.43% for VEXC.
FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.07% for VEXC.
Find the right allocation for FNDE and VEXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer