FNDE vs. EMEQ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. FNDE is passively managed, while EMEQ is actively managed. Over the past year, FNDE returned 29.79% vs 119.00% for EMEQ. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FNDE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMEQ.

Performance

FNDE vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 60.87% return.

FNDE

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 5.81%
• 6M: 7.39%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 1Y: 29.79%
• 3Y*: 20.36%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: 9.98%
• ALL TIME*: 7.27%

EMEQ

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: -3.98%
• 6M: 35.98%
• YTD: 60.87%
• 1Y: 119.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 68.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$8.38M	$8.71M	$11.25M
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$31.25M	$31.29M	$33.84M

FNDE vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF	16.21%	29.46%	2.29%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	60.87%	69.78%	-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and EMEQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.78

The correlation between FNDE and EMEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. EMEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDE	EMEQ
Financial Services	25.0%	11.6%
Technology	22.3%	58.0%
Energy	13.2%	7.2%
Basic Materials	12.0%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	6.2%
Communication Services	6.6%	5.5%
Industrials	4.6%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	2.7%
Utilities	2.4%	0.9%
Real Estate	1.4%	-
Healthcare	0.4%	1.0%

Return for Risk

FNDE vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDE

FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 71
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 91
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDE vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDE	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.96	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	3.19	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.46	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	4.56	-1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.25	16.21	-6.96

FNDE vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -26.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDE	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.55%	-26.25%	-17.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.23%	-26.25%	+16.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-17.20%	+16.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.61%	-4.73%	-6.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	7.37%	-4.14%

Volatility

FNDE vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) is 4.18%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that FNDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDE	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	14.67%	-10.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.38%	37.65%	-24.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	40.47%	-24.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.08%	34.16%	-17.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	34.16%	-15.03%

FNDE vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDE vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than EMEQ's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.71%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF	3.56%	4.19%	4.82%	4.74%	5.59%	4.32%	2.50%	3.47%	2.98%	2.05%	1.65%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDE and EMEQ in my portfolio?

FNDE and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDE or EMEQ?

EMEQ has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to FNDE (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs EMEQ's -26.25%.

Which ETF is better, FNDE or EMEQ?

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 119.00% vs 29.79% for FNDE. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDE or EMEQ?

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 119.00% return vs 29.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDE or EMEQ?

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDE or EMEQ?

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 1.71% for EMEQ.

What is the main difference between FNDE and EMEQ?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.