FNDE vs. EBND
FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF) and EBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index, while EBND is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDE returned 11.35%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for EBND. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EBND.
Performance
FNDE vs. EBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than EBND's 0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed EBND with an annualized return of 11.35%, while EBND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.82% annualized return.
FNDE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
EBND
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
FNDE vs. EBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | 13.70% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | 14.41% | -2.77% | 19.75% | -10.37% | 26.77% |
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 0.44% | 15.83% | -2.70% | 9.02% | -11.84% | -9.66% | 4.49% | 10.40% | -6.52% | 13.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDE and EBND is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FNDE and EBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDE vs. EBND — Risk / Return Rank
FNDE
EBND
FNDE vs. EBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDE | EBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 0.82 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | 2.63 | +8.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDE vs. EBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than EBND's maximum drawdown of -29.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and EBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDE | EBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.55% | -29.51% | -14.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -6.63% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.40% | -9.25% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -27.00% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.93% | -29.50% | -10.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -2.59% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -10.85% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.07% | +0.73% |
Volatility
FNDE vs. EBND - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) at 2.61%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDE | EBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 2.61% | +3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 6.19% | +6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 7.11% | +8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 9.00% | +8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 9.19% | +10.11% |
FNDE vs. EBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EBND's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDE vs. EBND - Dividend Comparison
FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than EBND's 5.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 5.79% | 5.54% | 5.89% | 5.26% | 4.75% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 4.70% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | 3.68% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDE and EBND have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDE has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to EBND (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs EBND's -29.51%.
On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 11.35% vs 1.82% for EBND. On fees, EBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EBND has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.
EBND has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 3.68% for FNDE.
FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EBND is Emerging Markets Bonds. FNDE tracks Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index, while EBND tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.30% for EBND.
FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDE and EBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer