PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. DFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNDE having a 15.28% return and DFAS slightly higher at 15.89%.


FNDE

1D
1.39%
1M
3.43%
YTD
15.28%
6M
17.23%
1Y
33.20%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
11.35%

DFAS

1D
0.05%
1M
6.49%
YTD
15.89%
6M
13.64%
1Y
32.03%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
15.28%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%-2.64%
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
15.89%8.17%10.21%17.83%-13.84%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and DFAS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.58

The correlation between FNDE and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. DFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
DFAS

Technology

23.3%
15.1%

Financial Services

16.2%
19.2%

Energy

10.4%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
13.0%

Basic Materials

8.1%
5.2%

Industrials

3.6%
18.9%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.6%

Utilities

1.9%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
4.2%

Healthcare

1.1%
12.0%

Technology

FNDE
23.3%
DFAS
15.1%

Financial Services

FNDE
16.2%
DFAS
19.2%

Energy

FNDE
10.4%
DFAS
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
8.1%
DFAS
13.0%

Basic Materials

FNDE
8.1%
DFAS
5.2%

Industrials

FNDE
3.6%
DFAS
18.9%

Communication Services

FNDE
3.5%
DFAS
2.6%

Utilities

FNDE
1.9%
DFAS
2.8%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.5%
DFAS
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
1.2%
DFAS
4.2%

Healthcare

FNDE
1.1%
DFAS
12.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAS
DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDEDFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.44

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

11.81

+0.06

FNDE vs. DFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the DFAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and DFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and DFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEDFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-26.13%

-17.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-9.36%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-26.13%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-26.13%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

0.00%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.69%

-8.26%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.72%

+0.08%

Volatility

FNDE vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) at 5.17%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEDFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

5.17%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

11.88%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

16.98%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

20.85%

-3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.31%

20.84%

-1.53%

FNDE vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAS's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than DFAS's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
0.90%0.99%0.93%1.00%1.03%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.63%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and DFAS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDE has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to DFAS (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs DFAS's -26.13%.

On 5-year performance, FNDE leads with 9.90% vs 8.05% for DFAS. On fees, DFAS is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 8.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAS is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.90% for DFAS.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DFAS is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.34% for DFAS.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and DFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer