FNDE vs. DFAS
FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while DFAS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. FNDE is passively managed, while DFAS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDE returned 9.90%/yr vs 8.05%/yr for DFAS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for DFAS.
Performance
FNDE vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNDE having a 15.28% return and DFAS slightly higher at 15.89%.
FNDE
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
DFAS
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- 1Y
- 32.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDE vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 15.28% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | -2.64% |
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 15.89% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDE and DFAS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FNDE and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDE vs. DFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDE
DFAS
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
FNDE
DFAS
Financial Services
FNDE
DFAS
Energy
FNDE
DFAS
Consumer Cyclical
FNDE
DFAS
Basic Materials
FNDE
DFAS
Industrials
FNDE
DFAS
Communication Services
FNDE
DFAS
Utilities
FNDE
DFAS
Real Estate
FNDE
DFAS
Consumer Defensive
FNDE
DFAS
Healthcare
FNDE
DFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDE vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank
FNDE
DFAS
FNDE vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDE | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 3.44 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 11.81 | +0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDE vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and DFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDE | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.55% | -26.13% | -17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -9.36% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.40% | -26.13% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -26.13% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | 0.00% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -8.26% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.72% | +0.08% |
Volatility
FNDE vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) at 5.17%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDE | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 5.17% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.13% | 11.88% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 16.98% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 20.85% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 20.84% | -1.53% |
FNDE vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAS's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDE vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison
FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than DFAS's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.90% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.63% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDE and DFAS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDE has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to DFAS (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs DFAS's -26.13%.
On 5-year performance, FNDE leads with 9.90% vs 8.05% for DFAS. On fees, DFAS is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 8.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAS is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.90% for DFAS.
FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DFAS is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.34% for DFAS.
FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDE and DFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer