PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCL.L vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNCL.L vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FNCL.L is traded in EUR, while QTOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTOP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCL.L achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than QTOP's 24.18% return.


FNCL.L

1D
-1.73%
1M
0.98%
YTD
2.99%
6M
10.06%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
28.17%
5Y*
19.22%
10Y*
12.19%

QTOP

1D
0.00%
1M
11.53%
YTD
24.18%
6M
22.62%
1Y
43.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCL.L vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FNCL.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF
2.99%47.03%2.56%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
24.18%7.69%10.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCL.L and QTOP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

0.29

FNCL.L vs. QTOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNCL.L
QTOP

Financial Services

98.1%

-

Technology

1.2%
57.7%

Industrials

0.7%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.5%

Communication Services

-

17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.5%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FNCL.L
98.1%
QTOP

-

Technology

FNCL.L
1.2%
QTOP
57.7%

Industrials

FNCL.L
0.7%
QTOP
0.9%

Basic Materials

FNCL.L

-

QTOP
1.5%

Communication Services

FNCL.L

-

QTOP
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FNCL.L

-

QTOP
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

FNCL.L

-

QTOP
8.5%

Energy

FNCL.L

-

QTOP

-

Healthcare

FNCL.L

-

QTOP
3.3%

Real Estate

FNCL.L

-

QTOP

-

Utilities

FNCL.L

-

QTOP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNCL.L vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCL.L
FNCL.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCL.L vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCL.LQTOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

3.58

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

10.80

-4.91

FNCL.L vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCL.L and QTOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCL.LQTOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.46

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.15

-0.70

Drawdowns

FNCL.L vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCL.L drawdown since its inception was -45.18%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -27.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL.L and QTOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCL.LQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.18%

-27.66%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-12.11%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

0.00%

-2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-5.66%

-4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

4.00%

-0.39%

Volatility

FNCL.L vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) at 4.49%. This indicates that FNCL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNCL.LQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

4.49%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

12.76%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

17.62%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.77%

24.23%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

24.23%

-3.24%

FNCL.L vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNCL.L vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

FNCL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


PositionTTM20252024
FNCL.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.32%0.38%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNCL.L and QTOP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FNCL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNCL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QTOP.

FNCL.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while QTOP is Nasdaq-100. FNCL.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FNCL.L and 0.20% for QTOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNCL.L and QTOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer