PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNBCX vs. FSRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNBCX vs. FSRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class C (FNBCX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNBCX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than FSRCX's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FNBCX has underperformed FSRCX with an annualized return of 1.19%, while FSRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.89% annualized return.


FNBCX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.44%
6M
-0.25%
YTD
-0.01%
1Y
1.83%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*
1.19%
ALL TIME*
2.28%

FSRCX

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.25%
6M
0.65%
YTD
1.23%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
2.89%
ALL TIME*
4.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNBCX vs. FSRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNBCX
Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class C
-0.01%5.48%3.51%4.90%-7.02%-2.28%4.04%4.90%-0.38%0.79%
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
1.23%7.88%4.38%7.98%-12.53%2.56%6.41%9.95%-3.81%7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FNBCX and FSRCX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1994

0.54

The correlation between FNBCX and FSRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNBCX vs. FSRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNBCX
FNBCX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FNBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FNBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRCX
FSRCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNBCX vs. FSRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class C (FNBCX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNBCXFSRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.84

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

6.92

-2.09

FNBCX vs. FSRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNBCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the FSRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNBCX and FSRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNBCX vs. FSRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNBCX drawdown since its inception was -13.02%, smaller than the maximum FSRCX drawdown of -18.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNBCX and FSRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNBCXFSRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.02%

-18.16%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.63%

-2.66%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.63%

-3.70%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.67%

-16.69%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.26%

-16.69%

+5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-1.74%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-2.08%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.71%

-0.19%

Volatility

FNBCX vs. FSRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class C (FNBCX) is 0.52%, while Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) has a volatility of 1.00%. This indicates that FNBCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNBCXFSRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

1.00%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

3.22%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05%

3.75%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.73%

4.54%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.35%

4.41%

-2.06%

FNBCX vs. FSRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNBCX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRCX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNBCX vs. FSRCX - Dividend Comparison

FNBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than FSRCX's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNBCX
Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class C
2.80%2.87%1.93%1.20%0.42%0.33%1.31%1.35%1.21%0.70%0.70%0.59%
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
3.09%3.32%2.59%3.03%2.08%3.36%3.59%3.33%2.50%3.20%2.69%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNBCX and FSRCX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRCX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to FNBCX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNBCX dropped -13.02% vs FSRCX's -18.16%.

FSRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNBCX and FSRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer