PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNARX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNARX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNARX achieves a 24.50% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FNARX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.


FNARX

1D
1.31%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
24.50%
6M
25.84%
1Y
48.02%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
20.22%
10Y*
10.96%

FCNTX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.72%
YTD
8.01%
6M
10.12%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
27.03%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNARX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNARX
Fidelity Natural Resources Fund
24.50%28.67%3.76%6.41%41.01%39.34%-20.86%19.09%-24.28%-0.11%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
8.01%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FNARX and FCNTX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1997

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between FNARX and FCNTX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNARX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNARX
FNARX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FNARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNARX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FNARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNARX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNARXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.94

1.83

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.82

2.54

+1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.33

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.66

2.26

+6.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.11

9.62

+13.49

FNARX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNARX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNARX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNARXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

1.83

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.79

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.89

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.78

-0.47

Drawdowns

FNARX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNARX drawdown since its inception was -71.04%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNARX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNARXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.04%

-49.19%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-11.30%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.64%

-19.75%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.93%

-32.59%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.10%

-32.59%

-31.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

-0.30%

-4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-8.16%

-11.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.65%

-0.50%

Volatility

FNARX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.24%. This indicates that FNARX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNARXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

3.24%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

10.48%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

14.06%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.99%

19.15%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.95%

19.68%

+7.27%

FNARX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNARX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNARX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FNARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FCNTX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.32%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FNARX
Fidelity Natural Resources Fund
1.76%1.89%1.51%1.60%2.42%1.46%1.79%1.42%1.17%1.38%0.62%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNARX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNARX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to FCNTX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNARX dropped -71.04% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FNARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNARX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer