PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMWIX vs. DGTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMWIX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Moderate with Income Allocation Fund (FMWIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FMWIX having a 4.15% return and DGTSX slightly higher at 4.16%.


FMWIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.15%
6M
4.53%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
10Y*

DGTSX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.25%
YTD
4.16%
6M
4.68%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
5.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMWIX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FMWIX
Fidelity Moderate with Income Allocation Fund
4.15%11.03%6.65%10.53%-9.08%
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
4.16%8.39%7.43%8.93%-5.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FMWIX and DGTSX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.88

The correlation between FMWIX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMWIX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMWIX
FMWIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FMWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FMWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

DGTSX
DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMWIX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Moderate with Income Allocation Fund (FMWIX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMWIXDGTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

3.05

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.71

4.60

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.64

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

4.00

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.92

17.92

-4.00

FMWIX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMWIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMWIX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMWIXDGTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

3.05

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.94

-0.17

Drawdowns

FMWIX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMWIX drawdown since its inception was -13.78%, smaller than the maximum DGTSX drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMWIX and DGTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMWIXDGTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.78%

-16.71%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

-2.64%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.78%

-7.46%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-1.65%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.59%

+0.32%

Volatility

FMWIX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Moderate with Income Allocation Fund (FMWIX) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.13%. This indicates that FMWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMWIXDGTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

1.13%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

2.73%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.88%

3.40%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.73%

5.96%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.73%

5.23%

+1.50%

FMWIX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMWIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FMWIX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

FMWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
5.70%5.54%7.28%4.75%2.77%7.62%2.12%2.57%2.99%1.25%1.26%1.50%
FMWIX
Fidelity Moderate with Income Allocation Fund
3.01%2.89%2.71%2.30%1.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMWIX and DGTSX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMWIX has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to DGTSX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMWIX dropped -13.78% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMWIX and DGTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer