PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUN vs. FELC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUN vs. FELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUN achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than FELC's 11.23% return.


FMUN

1D
0.03%
1M
0.93%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.24%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FELC

1D
-0.59%
1M
5.59%
YTD
11.23%
6M
11.57%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUN vs. FELC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMUN and FELC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUN vs. FELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUN
FMUN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUN vs. FELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMUNFELCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.44

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.16

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

14.66

-6.78

FMUN vs. FELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the FELC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUN and FELC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMUNFELCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.41

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

1.59

-0.31

Drawdowns

FMUN vs. FELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUN drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum FELC drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUN and FELC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUNFELCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-18.59%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-9.09%

+5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.59%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-1.91%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.95%

-0.98%

Volatility

FMUN vs. FELC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) is 1.27%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that FMUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUNFELCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

2.78%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

8.93%

-6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

11.90%

-8.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.06%

15.17%

-11.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.06%

15.17%

-11.11%

FMUN vs. FELC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUN has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FELC's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FMUN vs. FELC - Dividend Comparison

FMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than FELC's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.85%0.92%1.03%0.04%
FMUN
Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF
3.29%2.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMUN and FELC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELC has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to FMUN (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUN dropped -3.21% vs FELC's -18.59%.

On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 28.58% vs 7.61% for FMUN. On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FMUN has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 28.58% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELC.

FMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.85% for FELC.

FMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FELC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for FMUN and 0.18% for FELC.

FMUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUN and FELC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer