PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUEX vs. MCMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUEX vs. MCMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) and Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUEX achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly higher than MCMVX's 13.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FMUEX has underperformed MCMVX with an annualized return of 11.49%, while MCMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


FMUEX

1D
0.26%
1M
3.66%
YTD
16.57%
6M
18.19%
1Y
36.56%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
11.49%

MCMVX

1D
-0.94%
1M
4.35%
YTD
13.24%
6M
14.03%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUEX vs. MCMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMUEX
RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund
16.57%12.79%8.09%17.10%-10.47%31.75%5.65%22.44%-11.62%13.44%
MCMVX
Monongahela All Cap Value Fund
13.24%9.74%15.38%12.18%-7.73%22.57%13.24%26.98%-8.15%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FMUEX and MCMVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2013

0.91

The correlation between FMUEX and MCMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUEX vs. MCMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUEX
FMUEX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FMUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MCMVX
MCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUEX vs. MCMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) and Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMUEXMCMVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

1.88

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.63

2.73

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

3.10

+1.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.15

11.38

+5.77

FMUEX vs. MCMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the MCMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUEX and MCMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMUEXMCMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

1.88

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.71

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.68

-0.24

Drawdowns

FMUEX vs. MCMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUEX drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than MCMVX's maximum drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUEX and MCMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUEXMCMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-36.75%

-21.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-8.56%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-21.06%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.49%

-21.06%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

-36.75%

-5.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.61%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-4.08%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.33%

-0.23%

Volatility

FMUEX vs. MCMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) is 3.74%, while Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that FMUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUEXMCMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.33%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

10.42%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

14.45%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

16.68%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

18.05%

+1.69%

FMUEX vs. MCMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUEX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than MCMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUEX vs. MCMVX - Dividend Comparison

FMUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than MCMVX's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMUEX
RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund
1.61%1.87%0.00%4.12%8.26%4.38%1.61%5.57%5.88%3.80%4.80%8.51%
MCMVX
Monongahela All Cap Value Fund
5.75%6.51%5.41%3.23%4.79%7.61%1.25%3.09%6.87%10.44%2.13%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FMUEX and MCMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MCMVX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to FMUEX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUEX dropped -58.03% vs MCMVX's -36.75%.

FMUEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUEX and MCMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer