PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUEX vs. FSLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUEX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUEX achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 21.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FMUEX having a 11.58% annualized return and FSLSX not far behind at 11.42%.


FMUEX

1D
0.81%
1M
5.31%
YTD
17.52%
6M
17.64%
1Y
35.95%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
11.58%

FSLSX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.49%
YTD
21.04%
6M
13.49%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUEX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMUEX
RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund
17.52%12.79%8.09%17.10%-10.47%31.75%5.65%22.44%-11.62%13.44%
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
21.04%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%33.32%8.24%34.54%-16.90%17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FMUEX and FSLSX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.94

The correlation between FMUEX and FSLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUEX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUEX
FMUEX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FMUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUEX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMUEXFSLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

1.73

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

2.30

+1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.32

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

3.32

+1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.98

10.82

+7.15

FMUEX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUEX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMUEXFSLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.73

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.45

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.52

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.54

-0.10

Drawdowns

FMUEX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUEX drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, smaller than the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUEX and FSLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUEXFSLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-69.87%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-9.79%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-26.81%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.49%

-26.81%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

-47.98%

+5.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-8.28%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.99%

-0.89%

Volatility

FMUEX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) is 3.79%, while Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that FMUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUEXFSLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

4.27%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

14.50%

-4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

18.78%

-4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

20.50%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

21.92%

-2.18%

FMUEX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUEX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUEX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

FMUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMUEX
RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund
1.59%1.87%0.00%4.12%8.26%4.38%1.61%5.57%5.88%3.80%4.80%8.51%
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FMUEX and FSLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSLSX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FMUEX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUEX dropped -58.03% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

FMUEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUEX and FSLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer