PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUB vs. PLTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUB vs. PLTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUB achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than PLTU's -63.06% return.


FMUB

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.40%
YTD
2.07%
6M
2.12%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTU

1D
-13.93%
1M
-26.90%
YTD
-63.06%
6M
-69.13%
1Y
-47.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUB vs. PLTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMUB and PLTU is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUB vs. PLTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUB
FMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTU
PLTU Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PLTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUB vs. PLTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMUBPLTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.98

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

-0.65

+3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

-1.14

+12.40

FMUB vs. PLTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the PLTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUB and PLTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMUB vs. PLTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUB drawdown since its inception was -2.74%, smaller than the maximum PLTU drawdown of -74.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUB and PLTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUBPLTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-74.31%

+71.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-74.31%

+71.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-74.31%

+74.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.47%

-32.96%

+32.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

42.16%

-41.53%

Volatility

FMUB vs. PLTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) is 0.75%, while Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) has a volatility of 37.84%. This indicates that FMUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUBPLTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

37.84%

-37.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

78.30%

-76.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

102.79%

-100.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

126.55%

-122.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.64%

126.55%

-122.91%

FMUB vs. PLTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTU's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUB vs. PLTU - Dividend Comparison

FMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than PLTU's 64.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FMUB
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF
3.42%2.63%0.00%
PLTU
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares
64.37%23.29%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMUB and PLTU have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTU has higher volatility (37.84%) compared to FMUB (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUB dropped -2.74% vs PLTU's -74.31%.

On 1-year performance, FMUB leads with 7.03% vs -47.93% for PLTU. On fees, FMUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMUB has performed better with a 7.03% return vs -47.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for PLTU.

PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 64.37%, compared with 3.42% for FMUB.

FMUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PLTU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FMUB and 0.97% for PLTU.

FMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUB and PLTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer