PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMTM vs. AVALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMTM vs. AVALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTM achieves a 28.93% return, which is significantly higher than AVALX's 17.29% return.


FMTM

1D
0.84%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
28.93%
6M
30.60%
1Y
60.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVALX

1D
1.78%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
17.29%
6M
17.59%
1Y
50.49%
3Y*
32.38%
5Y*
20.79%
10Y*
20.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTM vs. AVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
28.93%28.21%
AVALX
Aegis Value Fund
17.29%48.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FMTM and AVALX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMTM vs. AVALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AVALX
AVALX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMTM vs. AVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMTMAVALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.51

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.98

6.25

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.05

21.12

-2.07

FMTM vs. AVALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the AVALX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMTM and AVALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMTM vs. AVALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTM drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum AVALX drawdown of -73.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTM and AVALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMTMAVALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-73.72%

+61.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-8.32%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-4.41%

+2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-10.94%

+9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.46%

+0.70%

Volatility

FMTM vs. AVALX - Volatility Comparison

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Aegis Value Fund (AVALX) at 5.33%. This indicates that FMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMTMAVALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

5.33%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.85%

13.33%

+5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.67%

17.35%

+6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.40%

22.31%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

22.18%

+1.22%

FMTM vs. AVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AVALX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMTM vs. AVALX - Dividend Comparison

FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than AVALX's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVALX
Aegis Value Fund
1.99%2.34%7.07%2.23%0.16%0.00%6.62%2.36%6.18%0.00%1.45%0.04%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.23%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMTM and AVALX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to AVALX (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMTM dropped -12.12% vs AVALX's -73.72%.

AVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMTM and AVALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer