PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMSFX vs. VBIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMSFX vs. VBIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMSFX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than VBIMX's -0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FMSFX has underperformed VBIMX with an annualized return of 1.25%, while VBIMX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.79% annualized return.


FMSFX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.97%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
1.25%

VBIMX

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.47%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMSFX vs. VBIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMSFX
Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund
0.66%8.29%1.00%4.91%-12.61%-1.20%4.41%6.43%0.79%2.35%
VBIMX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
-0.52%8.59%1.55%5.78%-13.25%-2.50%9.83%10.22%-0.13%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FMSFX and VBIMX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2006

0.84

The correlation between FMSFX and VBIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMSFX vs. VBIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMSFX
FMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIMX
VBIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VBIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMSFX vs. VBIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMSFXVBIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.17

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.20

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

3.33

+3.38

FMSFX vs. VBIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMSFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the VBIMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMSFX and VBIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMSFX vs. VBIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMSFX drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, roughly equal to the maximum VBIMX drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMSFX and VBIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMSFXVBIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-19.07%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-3.42%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.04%

-6.05%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-18.84%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.81%

-19.07%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-2.30%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-3.32%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.23%

-0.33%

Volatility

FMSFX vs. VBIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) is 1.23%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that FMSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMSFXVBIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.33%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

3.13%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94%

4.16%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.80%

6.39%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.14%

5.39%

-0.25%

FMSFX vs. VBIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMSFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIMX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMSFX vs. VBIMX - Dividend Comparison

FMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than VBIMX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMSFX
Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund
3.92%3.93%4.12%3.50%1.43%0.62%2.40%2.62%2.57%2.60%2.65%2.05%
VBIMX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.25%4.03%3.82%2.82%2.41%3.23%2.95%2.75%2.89%2.76%3.08%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FMSFX and VBIMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBIMX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to FMSFX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMSFX dropped -18.81% vs VBIMX's -19.07%.

FMSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMSFX and VBIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer