FMRFX vs. NASDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 (FMRFX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX).
FMRFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 16, 2019. NASDX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2000.
Performance
FMRFX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMRFX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMRFX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 | -1.59% | 14.48% | 7.33% | 12.86% | -16.18% | 9.11% | 14.08% | 7.39% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | -9.12% | 21.00% | 36.91% | 54.69% | -32.57% | 27.32% | 48.59% | 15.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMRFX achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's -9.12% return.
FMRFX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 10.98%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.15%
- 10Y*
- —
NASDX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 24.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMRFX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMRFX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMRFX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank
FMRFX
NASDX
FMRFX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 (FMRFX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMRFX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.88 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 1.40 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.31 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 5.01 | +2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMRFX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.88 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.63 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.29 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMRFX and NASDX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMRFX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison
FMRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than NASDX's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMRFX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 | 2.83% | 2.69% | 2.72% | 2.60% | 4.20% | 4.94% | 3.14% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | 3.93% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 7.61% | 3.75% | 2.59% | 1.28% | 7.09% | 2.47% | 1.65% | 0.75% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
FMRFX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMRFX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMRFX and NASDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMRFX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.37% | -83.16% | +60.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.36% | -12.70% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.37% | -35.33% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -11.90% | +6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -34.59% | +29.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 3.32% | -1.85% |
Volatility
FMRFX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 (FMRFX) is 3.31%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that FMRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMRFX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 5.38% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.11% | 12.45% | -7.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.53% | 22.55% | -14.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.78% | 23.03% | -14.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.04% | 22.61% | -12.57% |