PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMRFX vs. FFOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMRFX vs. FFOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 (FMRFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FMRFX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

FFOPX

1D
1.95%
1M
-0.50%
6M
7.18%
YTD
10.27%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
11.40%
ALL TIME*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FMRFX vs. FFOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6
5.15%14.48%7.33%12.86%-16.18%9.11%14.08%7.39%
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
10.27%21.41%14.20%19.97%-18.20%15.98%16.55%11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FMRFX and FFOPX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2019

0.94

The correlation between FMRFX and FFOPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMRFX vs. FFOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMRFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FFOPX
FFOPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMRFX vs. FFOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 (FMRFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMRFXFFOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

FMRFX vs. FFOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMRFX vs. FFOPX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMRFXFFOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

Volatility

FMRFX vs. FFOPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMRFXFFOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

FMRFX vs. FFOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMRFX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FFOPX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMRFX vs. FFOPX - Dividend Comparison

FMRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than FFOPX's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
1.81%2.01%2.04%1.98%2.07%2.05%1.97%15.21%2.32%2.09%2.14%2.01%
FMRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6
2.56%2.69%2.72%2.60%4.20%4.94%3.14%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMRFX and FFOPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMRFX and FFOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer