PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMRFX vs. FHTEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMRFX vs. FHTEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 (FMRFX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M (FHTEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMRFX achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly lower than FHTEX's 13.67% return.


FMRFX

1D
0.38%
1M
2.85%
YTD
7.35%
6M
7.93%
1Y
17.51%
3Y*
11.90%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*

FHTEX

1D
0.67%
1M
5.36%
YTD
13.67%
6M
15.06%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMRFX vs. FHTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6
7.35%14.48%7.33%12.86%-16.18%9.11%14.08%7.39%
FHTEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M
13.67%22.02%15.45%19.87%-19.46%15.73%17.10%12.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FMRFX and FHTEX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FMRFX and FHTEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMRFX vs. FHTEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMRFX
FMRFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FMRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FMRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FHTEX
FHTEX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FHTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FHTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMRFX vs. FHTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 (FMRFX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M (FHTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMRFXFHTEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.45

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.16

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

14.00

-0.34

FMRFX vs. FHTEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FHTEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMRFX and FHTEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMRFXFHTEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.43

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.67

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.68

+0.10

Drawdowns

FMRFX vs. FHTEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMRFX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, smaller than the maximum FHTEX drawdown of -31.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMRFX and FHTEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMRFXFHTEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-31.37%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-9.73%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.70%

-15.58%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-28.16%

+5.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-6.10%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

2.19%

-0.89%

Volatility

FMRFX vs. FHTEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6 (FMRFX) is 2.63%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M (FHTEX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that FMRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMRFXFHTEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

4.26%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.89%

10.44%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.11%

12.67%

-5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.86%

15.13%

-6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

16.91%

-6.88%

FMRFX vs. FHTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMRFX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FHTEX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMRFX vs. FHTEX - Dividend Comparison

FMRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than FHTEX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHTEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M
2.99%2.10%4.34%1.62%5.81%7.93%4.28%2.65%3.51%
FMRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K6
2.62%2.69%2.72%2.60%4.20%4.94%3.14%1.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FMRFX and FHTEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHTEX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to FMRFX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMRFX dropped -22.37% vs FHTEX's -31.37%.

FMRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMRFX and FHTEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer