FMPOX vs. NAMAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX).
FMPOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 13, 2007. NAMAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 20, 2001.
Performance
FMPOX vs. NAMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMPOX vs. NAMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMPOX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 0.59% | 13.02% | 14.48% | 22.51% | -10.62% | 33.96% | 0.95% | 23.61% | -18.93% | 17.03% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 4.45% | 13.77% | 13.14% | 9.65% | -9.33% | 32.28% | 6.90% | 31.56% | -18.46% | 13.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMPOX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than NAMAX's 4.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FMPOX having a 9.64% annualized return and NAMAX not far ahead at 10.00%.
FMPOX
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
NAMAX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.59%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMPOX vs. NAMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMPOX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NAMAX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMPOX vs. NAMAX — Risk / Return Rank
FMPOX
NAMAX
FMPOX vs. NAMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX) and Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMPOX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.22 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.75 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 1.53 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 6.72 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMPOX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.22 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.46 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMPOX and NAMAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMPOX vs. NAMAX - Dividend Comparison
FMPOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than NAMAX's 6.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMPOX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 7.80% | 8.26% | 10.51% | 1.17% | 13.25% | 1.31% | 2.00% | 1.86% | 14.92% | 8.99% | 1.37% | 5.23% |
NAMAX Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund | 6.40% | 6.71% | 7.07% | 0.74% | 6.39% | 8.99% | 3.22% | 3.38% | 27.38% | 21.08% | 8.07% | 17.05% |
Drawdowns
FMPOX vs. NAMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMPOX drawdown since its inception was -61.76%, roughly equal to the maximum NAMAX drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMPOX and NAMAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMPOX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.76% | -60.44% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -13.67% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.74% | -20.90% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.11% | -43.24% | -1.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.29% | -8.49% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -8.56% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 3.12% | +0.47% |
Volatility
FMPOX vs. NAMAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund (NAMAX) at 5.15%. This indicates that FMPOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMPOX | NAMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 5.15% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.76% | 10.28% | +1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.47% | 18.87% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 18.09% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 20.00% | +1.05% |